| |
Thursday, May 23, 1996
Uris Hall,
Columbia University
Sponsored by the Columbia Institute
for Tele-Information.
Transcript Summary
Program
About the Conference
The
Telecommunications Act of 1996 is a watershed in the development of
information services. Among the changes is a wholesale revision of the
FCC's rules and policies on local telephone companies' participation
in video programming and delivery. The telcos, once considered a great
threat to the video marketplace, have been let loose to compete.
The 1996 Act
scraps the FCC's old video dialtone (VDT) rules, which limited telcos
to common-carriage video service and generally excluded them from programming.
Telcos are now entitled to provide video programming and to do it through
radio, common carriage, or a new delivery medium called an open video
system (OVS).
OVS is still
taking shape; a pending FCC rulemaking will resolve many of the details.
But some things are certain. OVS will compete with other multichannel
delivery media -- cable, wireless, and satellite -- and will create
new service options for consumers. And its legal status will be a strange
new hybrid of the familiar legal categories of transmission: common
carriage, radio, and cable. For example, OVS operators will have to
share their systems with outside programmers, and will be barred from
discriminating among those programmers or charging them unreasonable
rates. But OVS operators are not supposed to be considered common carriers,
and will be subject to only some of the regulations applicable to broadcast
and cable.
This seminar considers OVS's impact on the future
video marketplace. Questions to be addressed include:
- What exactly is an OVS? How do its regulated and unregulated aspects
square with one another?
- How will OVS pricing decisions be made with respect to outside programmers
and end users?
- Who may provide OVS, and what would be the competitive result if
telcos enjoyed an exclusive right to this medium? How will the regulatory
obligations of an OVS differ from those of other media, and what will
be the competitive effects of those differences?
- How will mandatory carriage obligations work as a practical matter
if systems span different communities and cable franchise areas and
if customers select programming from various providers' packages?
- What will the user interface be like in such a system, and how will
channel positioning and navigational strategies and advantages play
out?
- How will OVS operators tailor their services to community needs
while observing the common-carriage elements of the regulatory scheme?
Issues to
be considered include: What is an OVS? Who may provide and use it? And
how will it affect competition and consumers?
FCC's Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking for OVS
Moderator:
Eli M. Noam, Professor and Director,
The Columbia Institute for Tele-Information
Our distinguished panel includes:
- Daniel Brenner, VP for Law & Regulatory Policy, NCTA
- Barry Forbes, Exec. Director, Alliance for Community Media
- Meredith Jones, Chief, FCC Cable
Services Bureau
- Monroe Price, Professor, Benjamin
N. Cardozo School of Law
- William Squadron, Senior VP,
The News Corp (Fox)
- Karen Stevenson, General Counsel,
Tele-TV
- Leslie Vial, General Attorney, Bell
Atlantic
|